|
Red Poppies – Review
In 2000, Alai, the Tibetan author of Red Poppies, won China's most
prestigious literary award – the Mao Dun Prize. Coincidentally,
the Crossword Book Prize for the same year – India's equivalent
award for books written in English – was won by Jamyang Norbu, a
Tibetan born and brought up in exile, for his novel,
The Mandala of Sherlock Holmes.
After more than four decades of living either under
occupation or in exile, it seemed Tibetans were finally beginning to
find their voice – albeit in languages alien to them – and making
the first tentative steps towards giving shape and meaning to the
profound changes and experiences that they as a people had undergone
since the takeover of their country by Communist China in 1959.
As an exile Tibetan myself, I approached Alai's novel with an
equal mixture of expectation and trepidation. This, after all, was
the first novel written by a Tibetan from inside Tibet, one that
had captured the imagination of the Chinese public and was now being
feted in the West. Despite the problems the book had initially faced
in finding a publisher in China – purportedly for its political
overtones – it had finally not only been officially sanctioned but
also found favour among China's literary establishment. Clearly,
a trenchant attack on the Chinese occupation of Tibet was not on the
cards and I could understand Alai's dilemma; as a Tibetan living
in China, how do you write a book about Tibet that doesn't ruffle
official feathers and yet remains true to your own identity?
Red Poppies is set in the dying days of the chieftains who had
ruled the borderlands between Central Tibet and China for centuries
before they were forever swept away by advance of the People's
Liberation Army in 1949. Ethnically and culturally Tibetan,
these areas had existed largely independently of either Tibetan or
Chinese overlordship, sometimes paying tribute to one, sometimes to
the other and more often to neither. This is the region where Alai
himself was born and although he was educated at a Chinese boarding
school and writes only in Chinese, one assumes that he has strong
familial and cultural links to the place and an insider's insight
into the world of his ancestors.
The story unfolds through the eyes of the nameless, idiot second
son of Chieftain Maichi and charts the rise and fall of his family
as the patriarch and his two sons manipulate, fight and fornicate
their way into becoming the most powerful and wealthy of the
chieftains before predictably disappearing under the onslaught
of the Red Army. The eponymous poppies and their deadly harvest
of opium set the Maichi clan on their road to wealth and power,
although the real instigator of the family's good fortunes turns
out to be our narrator, the idiot.
The idiot is supposedly modelled after the popular Tibetan folk
figure, Aku Tonpa, whose lewd and bawdy exploits belie his real
identity as the emanation of the Buddha of Compassion and whose
hilarious and often ribald adventures are lessons in the true nature
of human existence. However, our narrator is neither an Aku Tonpa,
who purposely wears his mask of foolishness in order to expose human
weaknesses, nor a genuine idiot so suffused with childlike innocence
that his mere presence transforms events around him. In fact, there
is nothing remotely idiotic about the way he schemes, manoeuvres and
ultimately outwits everyone around him. But despite his exploits,
everyone continues to treat him like an idiot and he himself takes
great pains to constantly remind us of his intellectually challenged
status: "I was hopeless. A hopeless idiot." The idiot narrator
is simply a literary device and not a very convincing one at that.
The world of the chieftains that Alai describes is a far cry from
the meditative and peace-loving Shangri La of current Western
imagination. On the contrary, it is a hellishly brutal place where
despotic cruelty, casual violence, ready sex and the relentless
pursuit of blood feuds are the order of the day. Heads are lopped off
(there is no evidence that this Chinese custom was ever carried out
in Tibetan areas), tongues cut out and ears and hands chopped off
at the slightest of transgressions. Buddhism, rather than being
an ameliorating influence, is a superstitious mélange of magic,
incantations and meaningless rituals, its lamas controlled by the
chieftain and routinely humiliated by him. This is a depiction
of Old Tibet that could have rolled straight off the presses of
the Communist Party's propaganda machine, which, to this day,
happily accuses the Dalai Lama and his followers of rape, murder
and child cannibalism.
Of course, we are no longer so naïve as to believe that Old Tibet
was a Buddhist paradise. We know it was feudal, backward and deeply
conservative, that power lay entrenched within the aristocracy and
the religious establishment, which resisted all efforts at change
or reform. But Alai's picture of life in the days before the
Communists came is so relentlessly without any redeeming qualities,
so over-the-top that it loses any sense of reality and becomes a
grotesque cartoon creation. Is Alai simply a victim of his Chinese
upbringing, faithfully spewing out the party line, unable to
distinguish the truth from lies? I don't think so.
There are intimations that this exaggeration is deliberate and
that Alai may have a deeper, more subtle agenda, which is to show
that the downfall of the chieftains and their loss of humanity
and spirituality stems from the time when they forgot that they
had originally come from Tibet proper, and instead, turned to the
east, to China, the source of their titles and material wealth. The
chieftains "had always preferred the worldly empire of the east,
not the land of western deities." But this choice would prove to
be their undoing for eventually, only negative and corrupting things
would come from this direction; opium, prostitution, syphilis and
finally, destruction, in the form of the Red Army. The ambiguity
of Alai's attitudes towards his native land can be heard, echoed
in the idiot's final thoughts before life ebbs away from him,
"Dear God, if our souls can really be reincarnated, please send me
back to this place in my next life. I love this beautiful place."
But even if this were the case, it is too late to save the book,
for long before the narrative lurches to its predestined conclusion,
we no longer care about what happens to the idiot or to the Maichi
clan or to the two-dimensional cartoon world of the chieftains.
|